VENDORS

Students' Testimonials



Killexams.com 000-224 Dumps and Real Questions 2019

Latest and 100% real exam Questions - Memorize Questions and Answers - Guaranteed Success in exam



000-224 exam Dumps Source : Power Systems with POWER7 Common Technical Sales Skills -v2

Test Code : 000-224
Test Name : Power Systems with POWER7 Common Technical Sales Skills -v2
Vendor Name : IBM
Q&A : 85 Real Questions

What a great source of 000-224 questions that work in real test.
if you need high best 000-224 dumps, then killexams.com is the final preference and your most effective solution. it givesincredible and awesome test dumps which i am pronouncing with full self assurance. I usually notion that 000-224 dumps are of no makes use of however killexams.com proved me wrong because the dumps supplied by them were of super use and helped me marks high. in case you are disturbing for 000-224 dumps as rightly, then you want now not to fear and be part of killexams.


it's far proper location to find 000-224 dumps paper.
Me and my roommate have been dwelling together for a long term and we have loads of disagreements and arguments concerning numerous topics however if there may be one issue that each humans agree on it is the truth that this killexams.com is the excellent one at the internet to use if you want to pass your 000-224 . Both people used it and feature beenvery happy with the very last consequences that we had been given. I used with the intention to carry out well in my 000-224 test and my marks were certainly brilliant. Thanks for the guidance.


am i able to locate real Q&A state-of-the-art 000-224 exam?
I passed. Genuine, the exam was hard, so I just got past it on account of killexams.com Q&A and Exam Simulator. I am upbeat to report that I passed the 000-224 exam and have as of late acquired my declaration. The framework questions were the part I was most stressed over, so I invested hours honing on the killexams.com exam simulator. It beyond any doubt helped, as consolidated with different segments.


it is extraordinary to have 000-224 real examination questions.
A portion of the lessons are quite problematic but I understand them utilising the killexams.com Q&A and Exam Simulator and solved all questions. Essentially on account of it; I breezed thru the test horribly essentially. Your 000-224 dumps Product are unmatchable in fine and correctness. All the questions in your object were inside the test as nicely. I was flabbergasted to examine the exactness of your material. Much obliged over again on your assistance and all the assist that you provided to me.


That was Awesome! I got actual test questions of 000-224 exam.
The top class education i have ever experienced. I took many 000-224 certification checks, but 000-224 turned out to be the perfect one way to killexams.com. i have recently located this internet site and desire I knew approximately it some years in the past. would have stored me a variety of sleepless nights and gray hair! The 000-224 exam is not an smooth one, mainly its ultra-modern version. however the 000-224 Q and A includes the present day questions, daily updates, and those are actually true and valid questions. I am convinced that is real cause I got maximum of them for the duration of my exam. I were given an top class marks and thank killexams.com to creating 000-224 exam strain-free.


Can I find real Q&A of 000-224 exam?
I desired to tell you that in past in notion that I could by no means be capable of pass the 000-224 check. But when I take the 000-224 education then I came to recognize that the web offerings and dump is the first-class bro! And after I gave the tests I passed it in first attempt. I instructed my pals about it, they also beginning the 000-224 schooling form here and finding it without a doubt terrific. Its my exceptional experience ever. Thank you


I feel very confident with 000-224 exam financial institution.
I cleared 000-224 exam with excessive marks. each time I had registered with killexams.com which helped me to attain greatermarks. Its top class to have help of killexams.com questions bank for such kind of test. thanks to all.


it is unbelieveable, however 000-224 real exam questions are availabe right here.
I put together human beings for 000-224 exam problem and refer all for your web site for further evolved making equipped. This is positively the excellent website that offers sturdy exam material. This is the quality asset I recognize of, as i have been going to numerous locales if no longer all, and i have presumed that killexams.com Dumps for 000-224 is virtually up to speed. A whole lot obliged killexams.com and the exam simulator.


exceptional to hear that real test questions of 000-224 exam are supplied here.
Passed the 000-224 exam the alternative day. I would have in no way completed it without your exam prep materials. Some months within the past I failed that exam the primary time I took it. Your questions are very similar to realone. I passed the exam very with out troubles this time. Thank you very plenty to your help.


simply strive real 000-224 test questions and achievement is yours.
best 000-224 exam training i have ever come upon. I passed 000-224 exam hassle-unfastened. No stress, no issues, and no frustrations in the course of the exam. I knew the whole thing I needed to recognise from this killexams.com 000-224 Questions set. The questions are legitimate, and i heard from my pal that their cash returned guarantee works, too. They do provide you with the money again in case you fail, however the component is, they make it very smooth to pass. unwell use them for my subsequent certification exams too.


IBM Power Systems with POWER7

IBM Refreshes system P Line with POWER7-based products | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

IBM Refreshes equipment P Line with POWER7-primarily based products

large Blue's refresh comprises the gargantuan power 795, which it pits in opposition t properly-shelf methods from HP and Oracle.

  • with the aid of Stephen Swoyer
  • 08/24/2010
  • IBM Corp. remaining week refreshed its gadget p server line with a number of new POWER7-primarily based techniques. The most recent POWER7 entries might not ship unless September 17.

    they will possible be worth the wait. huge Blue's revamped system p line comprises the gargantuan 256-manner vigour 795, which IBM pits without delay in opposition t good-shelf offerings from Hewlett-Packard Co. (HP) and Oracle Corp.

    huge Blue isn't simply thinking big, despite the fact: it additionally unveiled 4 system p "specific" entries -- i.e., smaller, less-expensive methods slated for the mid-market. IBM's POWER7 push additionally contains a committed system -- viz., the smart Analytics system 7700 -- designed for enterprise intelligence (BI) and information warehousing workloads. or not it's of a piece with the wise Analytics initiative that massive Blue kicked off remaining summer season, simply ahead of its acquisition of analytics powerhouse SPSS Inc.

    IBM's 256-core vigour 795 plays to device p's (and RISC/Unix's) normal strengths, and its smaller categorical entries -- the vigor 710, 720, 730, and 740 systems -- incorporate massive Blue's newest effort to grapple with commodity x86 (or x64, as is universally the case) servers operating chips from superior Micro contraptions (AMD) Inc. and Intel Corp. up to now, massive Blue had provided only a single power-based mostly categorical system, the energy 720.

    in this case, huge Blue is making a bet that a lots reduce can charge (enabled partially by using POWER7 chips that might otherwise have been discarded) in addition to an potential to run AIX, device i and Linux workloads will aid tip the scales in system p's want. furthermore, with POWER7, IBM is as soon as again fielding a 2U form-component server -- definitely, two 2U form-element servers, the vigour 710 and the vigor 730. Add all of it up and you have what feels like an honest effort to tackle the commodity server phase -- a traditionally challenging segment to crack.

    Proprietary Redux

    In an industry it is moving to commoditization (and relentlessly, at that), IBM Corp. is sticking to its proprietary weapons.

    To make sure, large Blue is a creditable commodity participant -- its system x hardware line is powered by way of chips from both AMD and Intel; its device x BladeCenter portfolio (which comprises an influence-based mostly offering) is not any. 2, average, behind HP -- nevertheless it likewise is still committed to homegrown silicon efforts reminiscent of POWER7, which powers (in one kind or a different) its system i, gadget p, and equipment z hardware traces.

    In a way, huge Blue's POWER7 CMOS now stands because the last of the Credible x86 alternate options.

    HP and Intel proceed to put money into IA64 (which is in accordance with an EPIC structure); Oracle has observed many of the correct things about SPARC (which has nevertheless been hemorrhaging relevance for half a decade or more); and different gamers (such as Fujitsu and Unisys Corp.) push their personal proprietary CMOS flavors, but none can aspect to the variety of salary performance (relative to earnings of aggressive, non-commodity systems) that IBM can.


    IBM POWER7 equipment Lineup Grows | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

    It seems that more desirable and faster transistors made from graphene are not all that IBM is working on, on the grounds that its fresh press unlock speaks of a new set of POWER7 servers for traumatic emerging purposes.

    though no longer basically focused on the customer market, IBM is certainly one of greatest names on the company, enterprise and industrial sectors as far as computing goes.

    It has a big portfolio of equipment for each present and rising applications, with financial features, scientific analysis and healthcare management being just a couple of of its retailers.

    What the enterprise did most lately turned into convey a brand new batch of better POWER7 blades and servers, which can be also respectable for consolidation and virtualization.

    "Our strategy seems to be paying off as more and more valued clientele choose vigour methods," pointed out Tom Rosamilia, everyday manager of IBM vigour and z systems.

    One product is the sixteen-core, single-large IBM BladeCenter PS703, which will also be an alternative choice to sprawling racks and is first rate for individuals concerned with energy efficiency.

    The BladeCenter PS704 is akin to its sibling above, simplest it has double the volume of cores and, as a consequence, 60-% faster efficiency in the equal area requirements as old-technology POWER7 items.

    The announcement additionally mentions the upgraded IBM power 750 express and the more desirable power 755, both with 32 POWER7 cores now.

    "we are running billions of severe calculations according to Einstein's conception of relativity on the POWER7 blades," observed Gaurav Khanna, professor of physics at UMass-Dartmouth.

    "working POWER7, i'm in a position to get effects as tons as eight times quicker than running the equal calculations on an Intel Xeon processor. Calculations that used to take a month to run at the moment are comprehensive in below per week. This ability that i will do eight times extra science within the identical timeframe than I might do earlier than."

    This page should have assistance on anything else involving IBMs smarter computing initiative.


    IBM Launches New POWER7 techniques With Linux support | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Feb 22, 2010

    IBM introduced new POWER7 methods, designed to manipulate probably the most disturbing rising functions, ranging from sensible electrical grids to actual-time analytics for fiscal markets. the brand new techniques comprise technologies for the really expert demands of latest purposes and capabilities that depend on processing massive numbers of concurrent transactions and information whereas inspecting that information in real time. moreover, the new methods enable valued clientele to manipulate current functions and features at much less charge with technology breakthroughs in virtualization, power savings, greater budget friendly use of reminiscence, and more suitable cost efficiency.

    The methods were launched with the Linux, AIX, and IBM i operating equipment help. the new programs and administration application encompass the IBM energy 780, a new class of scalable, excessive-conclusion servers, featuring an superior modular design with as much as sixty four POWER7 "cores," or CPUs, and the brand new TurboCore workload optimizing mode. TurboCore can carry up to two instances the efficiency per core of POWER6 processor-primarily based techniques, proposing amazing ROI for applications with excessive per-core efficiency necessities, equivalent to managing and inspecting transactions from a wise electrical grid.

    The IBM power 770 is a modular business gadget with up to 64 POWER7 cores, that includes greater efficiency per core than POWER6 processors and using as much as 70% much less power for the same variety of cores as the IBM power 570. IBM vigor 755, a excessive-performance computing cluster node with 32 POWER7 cores, is power megastar-qualified for energy efficiency, and optimized for the most challenging analytic workloads. moreover, the IBM vigor 750 specific, an power superstar-certified company server for mid-market clients, offers four times the processing capacity of its predecessor, the IBM power 550 specific, within the equal energy envelope and 10 times the efficiency of a similar HP Integrity rx6600.

    IBM methods Director categorical, average and business variants present new packaging of administration software for the brand new techniques and consist of the advanced virtualization management capabilities of VMControl, which helps a "methods pool" of assorted energy servers to be managed as one entity.

    The energy 750 express and 755 are transport, and the vigour 770 and 780 deliberate volume availability is March sixteen. The IBM methods Director variants, aiding each POWER7 and POWER6 models, will ship on March 5, IBM says. For extra information about vigor systems, go right here.


    Unquestionably it is hard assignment to pick dependable certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals get sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets concerning exam dumps update and validity. The vast majority of other's sham report dissension customers come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams joyfully and effortlessly. We never trade off on our review, reputation and quality on the grounds that killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certainty is imperative to us. Uniquely we deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report objection, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off chance that you see any false report posted by our rivals with the name killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protest or something like this, simply remember there are constantly awful individuals harming reputation of good administrations because of their advantages. There are a huge number of fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams hone questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, our specimen questions and test brain dumps, our exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

    [OPTIONAL-CONTENTS-2]


    SF-040X real questions | A00-270 study guide | HP2-B87 dumps questions | EX0-110 test prep | ACCUPLACER Practice test | H12-721 pdf download | HPE0-S46 questions and answers | 1T6-303 practice questions | HP0-763 questions and answers | 000-538 exam prep | 1Z0-628 sample test | CPT practice test | COG-112 brain dumps | E20-562 exam questions | 132-S-900.7 VCE | 7595X free pdf download | 1Z0-499 test prep | FC0-U41 test prep | 000-074 test questions | 000-294 Practice Test |


    [OPTIONAL-CONTENTS-3]

    Survey 000-224 real question and answers before you step through exam
    Are you looking for IBM 000-224 Dumps of real questions for the Power Systems with POWER7 Common Technical Sales Skills -v2 Exam prep? We provide most updated and quality 000-224 Dumps. Detail is at http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/000-224. We have compiled a database of 000-224 Dumps from actual exams in order to let you prepare and pass 000-224 exam on the first attempt. Just memorize our Q&A and relax. You will pass the exam.

    We have our specialists operating ceaselessly for the gathering of real test questions of 000-224. All the pass4sure Questions and Answers of 000-224 collected by our team are verified and updated by our IBM certified team. we have an approach to stay connected to the candidates appeared within the 000-224 exam to induce their reviews regarding the 000-224 exam, we have an approach to collect 000-224 exam tips and tricks, their expertise regarding the techniques utilized in the important 000-224 exam, the mistakes they wiped out the important exam then improve our braindumps consequently. Click http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/000-224 Once you bear our pass4sure Questions and Answers, you will feel assured regarding all the topics of exam and feel that your information has been greatly improved. These killexams.com Questions and Answers are not simply practice questions, these are real test Questions and Answers that are enough to pass the 000-224 exam first attempt. killexams.com Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders If you are inquisitive about success passing the IBM 000-224 exam to begin earning? killexams.com has forefront developed Power Systems with POWER7 Common Technical Sales Skills -v2 test questions that will make sure you pass this 000-224 exam! killexams.com delivers you the foremost correct, current and latest updated 000-224 exam questions and out there with a 100 percent refund guarantee. There are several firms that offer 000-224 brain dumps however those are not correct and latest ones. Preparation with killexams.com 000-224 new questions will be a best thing to pass this certification test in straightforward means.

    If you're seeking out 000-224 Practice Test containing Real Test Questions, you are at proper place. We have compiled database of questions from Actual Exams in order to help you prepare and pass your exam on the first try. All training materials at the site are Up To Date and tested via our specialists.

    killexams.com provide cutting-edge and up to date Practice Test with Actual Exam Questions and Answers for brand new syllabus of IBM 000-224 Exam. Practice our Real Questions and Answers to Improve your understanding and pass your exam with High Marks. We make sure your achievement in the Test Center, protecting all of the subjects of exam and build your Knowledge of the 000-224 exam. Pass four sure with our accurate questions.

    100% Pass Guarantee

    Our 000-224 Exam PDF includes Complete Pool of Questions and Answers and Brain dumps checked and established inclusive of references and references (wherein applicable). Our goal to collect the Questions and Answers isn't always best to pass the exam at the start strive however Really Improve Your Knowledge about the 000-224 exam subjects.

    000-224 exam Questions and Answers are Printable in High Quality Study Guide that you could download in your Computer or some other tool and begin making ready your 000-224 exam. Print Complete 000-224 Study Guide, carry with you while you are at Vacations or Traveling and Enjoy your Exam Prep. You can get right of entry to up to date 000-224 Exam Q&A out of your online account every time.

    nside seeing the bona fide exam material of the brain dumps at killexams.com you could without numerous an enlarge broaden your declare to fame. For the IT specialists, it's miles fundamental to modify their capacities as showed by way of their work need. We make it primary for our customers to hold certification exam with the assist of killexams.com confirmed and sincere to goodness exam material. For an splendid destiny in its domain, our brain dumps are the excellent choice. A nice dumps creating is a primary section that makes it straightforward for you to take IBM certifications. In any case, 000-224 braindumps PDF offers settlement for applicants. The IT announcement is a important troublesome attempt if one doesnt locate proper course as obvious aid material. Thus, we have true and updated material for the arranging of certification exam. It is essential to acquire to the guide cloth in case one desires towards keep time. As you require packs of time to look for revived and true exam material for taking the IT certification exam. If you locate that at one location, what can be higher than this? Its simply killexams.com that has what you require. You can store time and keep a strategic distance from hassle in case you purchase Adobe IT certification from our website online.

    killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
    WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all tests on internet site
    PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
    DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders extra than $ninety nine
    DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders


    Download your Power Systems with POWER7 Common Technical Sales Skills -v2 Study Guide straight away after shopping for and Start Preparing Your Exam Prep Right Now!


    Killexams HP0-S17 free pdf download | Killexams 000-M68 pdf download | Killexams 000-M198 test prep | Killexams HP2-B102 dumps questions | Killexams ST0-050 practice test | Killexams E20-365 free pdf | Killexams 000-184 cheat sheets | Killexams C2040-421 brain dumps | Killexams ECP-103 examcollection | Killexams HP0-Y23 test prep | Killexams 2V0-642 questions and answers | Killexams 1Z0-346 free pdf | Killexams ST0-153 study guide | Killexams CGAP brain dumps | Killexams COG-142 study guide | Killexams C2010-590 practice exam | Killexams JN0-660 VCE | Killexams 000-M92 test questions | Killexams HP2-Q04 exam prep | Killexams HP0-234 braindumps |


    [OPTIONAL-CONTENTS-5]

    View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps


    Killexams 000-451 pdf download | Killexams CA0-001 braindumps | Killexams A00-211 free pdf | Killexams FNS real questions | Killexams 7241X Practice Test | Killexams 132-S-815-1 dump | Killexams 190-712 real questions | Killexams 190-611 questions answers | Killexams C2030-283 test prep | Killexams 1Z0-964 practice test | Killexams HP0-045 test prep | Killexams 312-49v9 study guide | Killexams 040-444 dumps | Killexams TMPTE sample test | Killexams PCM braindumps | Killexams HP2-K09 exam prep | Killexams 70-516-VB test prep | Killexams HP0-W03 practice test | Killexams NSE6 questions and answers | Killexams 000-G01 real questions |


    Power Systems with POWER7 Common Technical Sales Skills -v2

    Pass 4 sure 000-224 dumps | Killexams.com 000-224 real questions | [HOSTED-SITE]

    Is the AI apocalypse a tired Hollywood trope, or human destiny? | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Why is it that every time humans develop a really clever computer system in the movies, it seems intent on killing every last one of us at its first opportunity?

    In Stanley Kubrick’s masterpiece, 2001: A Space Odyssey, HAL 9000 starts off as an attentive, if somewhat creepy, custodian of the astronauts aboard the USS Discovery One, before famously turning homicidal and trying to kill them all. In The Matrix, humanity’s invention of AI promptly results in human-machine warfare, leading to humans enslaved as a biological source of energy by the machines. In Daniel H. Wilson’s book Robopocalypse, computer scientists finally crack the code on the AI problem, only to have their creation develop a sudden and deep dislike for its creators.

    And you’re not an especially sentient being yourself if you haven’t heard the story of Skynet (see The Terminator, T2, T3, etc.)

    The simple answer is that — movies like Wall-E, Short Circuit, and Chappie, notwithstanding — Hollywood knows that nothing guarantees box office gold quite like an existential threat to all of humanity. Whether that threat is likely in real life or not is decidedly beside the point. How else can one explain the endless march of zombie flicks, not to mention those pesky, shark-infested tornadoes?

    The reality of AI is nothing like the movies. Siri, Alexa, Watson, Cortana — these are our HAL 9000s, and none seems even vaguely murderous. The technology has taken leaps and bounds in the last decade, and seems poised to finally match the vision our artists have depicted in film for decades. What then?

    Is Siri just a few upgrades away from killing you in your sleep, or is Hollywood running away with a tired idea? Looking back at the last decade of AI research helps to paint a clearer picture of a sometimes frightening, sometimes enlightened future.

    An increasing number of prominent voices are being raised about the real dangers of humanity’s continuing work on so-called artificial intelligence.

    Chief among them is Dr. Nick Bostrom, a philosopher who also holds degrees in physics and computational neuroscience. In his 2014 book, Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, he outlines in rigorous detail the various ways a “strong” AI — should we succeed in building one — would wipe us off the face of the planet the moment it escapes our control. Forget about wholesale nuclear annihilation — that’s how power-hungry human dictators go about dealing with an unwanted group of humans. No, a strong AI would instead starve us to death, use up all of our natural resources, or, if it’s feeling really desperate, dismantle our bodies at a molecular level and use the resulting biomass for its own purposes.

    Dr. Nick Bostrom warns about the potential dangers of a runaway AI at a 2015 TED talk in Vancouver, Canada. (Photo: Bret Hartman/TED)

    But don’t take it personally. As Bostrom points out, an artificial superintelligence likely won’t behave according to any human notions of morality or ethics. “Anthropomorphic frames encourage unfounded expectations about the growth trajectory of a seed AI and about the psychology, motivations, and capabilities of a mature superintelligence,” he says.

    Don’t let Bostrom’s professorial language fool you — he’s deadly serious about the consequences of an AI that can outthink even the smartest human being, and none of them are good. More frighteningly, he says that we may go from giving ourselves high-fives over creating the first AI that can think as well as we can to cowering in the corner as it hunts us down in as little as a few weeks, or perhaps even days. It all comes down to a few key factors that will likely influence our future with AI.

    Computers think really fast. In the best-case scenario, we’ll have enough time between an AI acquiring the ability to think as well as us and its rise to super-intelligent status that we can adjust and respond. On the other hand, as Bostrom points out, when you’re dealing with a machine that can think — and therefore develop — at an almost unimaginable speed, by the time we realize what’s going on, it will already be far too late to stop it. Some readers may remember the 1970s sci-fi horror flick Demon Seed, in which an AI not only predicts that it will be shut down by its fearful creator, but employs murder and rape to ensure its survival.

    “If and when a takeoff occurs,” Bostrom writes, “it will likely be explosive.” Stephen Hawking has echoed this sentiment: “Once humans design artificial intelligence,” he says, “it will take off on its own and develop at an ever-increasing rate. Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn’t compete and would be superseded.”

    Computers often produce unexpected results. AI researchers are regularly surprised by the outcome of their experiments. In 2013, a researcher discovered that his AI — designed to learn to play NES games — decided to pause the gameplay on Tetris as its preferred solution to the goal of not losing.

    At our early stage of AI development, this is a good thing; surprises often lead to new discoveries. Unexpected results paired with a massive and sudden surge in intelligence would be quite the opposite. Being able to anticipate the way a superintelligent AI will respond to, well, anything, could prove to be impossible, in much the same way our actions and motivations are utterly impenetrable to an insect.

    Strong AI, weak AI, and the stuff we already use

    Artificial intelligence research has at times resembled the hunt for the Holy Grail. In the summer of 1956, there was a belief that we could achieve strong AI (aka, artificial general intelligence), which can be thought of as mimicking human intelligence in all of its forms, functions, and subtleties. Researchers at Dartmouth University thought that if they could endow computers with the basic building blocks of human intelligence — reasoning, knowledge representation, planning, natural language processing, and perception — then somehow, general intelligence would simply emerge.

    Obviously, that didn’t happen. In fact, over the intervening decades, there were several boom and bust cycles in AI research (often dubbed “AI winters”) that moved a few of these building blocks forward, but then failed to show ongoing progress after an initial period of excitement.

    What did happen were various advances in each of the building blocks, resulting in an assortment of “weak AIs,” or practical AIs.

    AI doesn’t just exist in far-flung visions of the future. Google has been using it since 2015 to improve search results. (Video: Google)

    The Google search engine could just be the best-known example of weak AI. Its algorithms do an exceptional job of pulling together hundreds of variables and combining those with the words you type to produce a results page culled from the vastness of the web.

    In fact, most of the examples of AI from the past 10 years probably haven’t struck you as examples of AI at all, which just goes to show how successful they’ve been. Most have quietly and seamlessly integrated themselves into our lives, making them better in small but significant ways.

    Google’s Photos product shows how far we’ve come in perception AI — type in “bicycle” and it will find photos you’ve taken of two-wheeled vehicles, even if you never labeled them as such.

    The predictive text options that appear as we type on our phones save us valuable taps, while autocorrect attempts to make up for the fact that on-screen keyboards and human thumbs are a recipe for inaccuracy (notwithstanding the hilarity that often ensues when it tries to come to our rescue).

    Amazon’s “suggested for you” product recommendations feature is an example of AI used to make money. It was reportedly responsible for 35 percent of the company’s sales in 2006, and the people behind the technology have since made it available to other retailers, resulting in “billions” of sales.

    So-called intelligent assistants from Apple, Google, Amazon, and Microsoft (Siri, Google Now, Alexa, and Cortana, respectively) all leverage recent advances in natural language processing (NLP), combined with sophisticated heuristics, which make questions like “what’s the weather going to be like today?” the hands-free equivalent of jumping into a weather app or Googling the same phrase. Google’s CEO, Sundar Pichai, recently boasted that his company’s NLP AI is approaching human levels of understanding, which may explain why he told shareholders that “the next big step will be for the very concept of the ‘device’ to fade away.”

    The Waze GPS and crowdsourced mapping app is a great example of AI planning.

    Recently, chatbots have become the most “talked about” form of AI. In 2014, the University of Reading in England declared that the Turing Test had finally been passed, 65 years after its inception, by an algorithm masquerading as a 13-year-old Ukrainian boy named Eugene. Eugene is a chatbot — a pretty good one by all accounts — but despite passing the test, it is still not an example of true strong AI. Cleverbot — another AI chatbot – which is claimed to have passed the Turing Test in 2011, is available to have a chat with anyone. But labeling it “intelligent,” might depend on your definition of the word.

    Me: Do you believe in God?Clev: Do you?Me: That’s not an answer.Clev: You did not ask a question.Me: Yes I did. I asked: Do you believe in God?Clev: Yes, I do. Why don’t you?Me: Why do you think I don’t believe in God?Clev: Because you said that you did not.Me: No, I didn’t. You aren’t a very good listener, are you?Clev: Fine fine. I know you said that. But whatever. Do you like Lady Gaga?

    Both the Turing Test itself and the claims that it has been passed, are not without criticism.

    Microsoft learned just how fallible a chatbot AI can be in a spectacularly public fashion when it released Tay, an AI Twitter bot, on an unsuspecting global audience earlier this year. Less than 24 hours after Tay began interacting with people, she — er — it, became sexist and racist, offering praise for Hitler among other gaffes.

    From left to right, Jeopardy host Alex Trebek poses with legendary contestants Ken Jennings, IBM’s Watson supercomputer, and Brad Rutter. Watson would later wipe the floor with both human contestants in a showdown. (Photo: Jeopardy Productions)

    Where’s Watson?

    If the AI industry has a celebrity, it’s IBM’s Watson. After handily defeating all-time Jeopardy! champ Ken Jennings in 2011, the supercomputing application dropped the mic and started a new life in the somewhat less exciting sphere of commercial applications. But Watson’s victory caused a lot of people to start wondering if IBM’s wunderkind was in fact an embryonic HAL 9000. Guru Banavar, IBM’s Vice President of Cognitive Computing, places it in a different category entirely.

    “We think of AI as augmented intelligence, as opposed to artificial intelligence,” Banavar told Digital Trends. He believes that the notion of AI as a carbon copy of the human brain is a distraction, one that entirely misses the point of how this technology can best be put to use. “Augmented intelligence is a partnering between a person and a machine,” he explains, with the goal being to offload the work that a person isn’t able to do as well as the machine. It forms a symbiotic relationship of sorts, in which the two entities work better together than each of them would do on their own.

    IBM refers to this approach to AI as “cognitive computing,” specifically because it does not seek to replicate the entirety of human intelligence. The approach IBM took to solving the Jeopardy! problem wasn’t centered on making a synthetic brain, but rather on getting a machine to process a very specific type of information — language — in order to hunt for and ultimately produce the right answer for the game’s reverse-question format. To do this, Banavar recounts, took a combination of advances “going back almost 10 years.” Simply getting Watson to understand the massive number of permutations of meaning within English, was daunting. Its eventual success was “a big breakthrough for the whole field of computer science,” Banavar claims.

    IBM continues to develop Watson, as well as its other investments in AI, in pursuit of what Banavar calls “grand challenges.” These are computing problems so difficult and complex, they often require dozens of researchers and a sustained investment over months or years. Or, as Banavar puts it: “Not something you can do with a couple of guys in a garage.”

    A cluster of 90 IBM Power 750 servers power Watson, and each one uses a 3.5 GHz POWER7 eight-core processor. (Video: IBM)

    One such challenge is reading medical images. The growing number of X-rays, CT scans, PET scans, and MRIs being done every day is a potential lifesaving boon for patients, but it’s also a growing problem for the profession of radiology. At the moment, a radiologist must personally assess each scan to look for signs of disease or other anomalies. The sheer number of scans being done are creating increasing demand for trained radiologists, whose numbers are limited simply due to the rigorous and lengthy training required to become one. Banavar describes the work they do as “very monotonous and error prone,” not because these doctors lack the skill, but because they are only human. It’s a scenario that seems almost custom-built for the kind of AI that IBM has been working on. In order to significantly impact the number and quality of scans that can be processed, researchers are using Watson to understand the content of the images, within the full medical context of the patient. “Within the next two years,” Banavar says, “we will see some very significant breakthroughs in this.”

    Teaching a machine to learn

    For IBM to succeed, it will have to solve a problem that has plagued AI efforts from their very beginnings: Computers tend to follow the instructions they’re given in such a literal way that, when the unexpected occurs — a situation the developer hadn’t foreseen — they proceed anyway, often with undesirable outcomes. But what if machines possessed the ability to know when something doesn’t quite fit and adjust accordingly, without being told so explicitly? In other words, what if they possessed common sense?

    Dr. Maya Gupta is a senior AI researcher at Google, and she is attempting to do just that. Using a tool within the AI arsenal known as machine learning, Gupta and her colleagues are slowly training computers to filter information in a way that most humans find relatively simple. Her current goal — improving video recommendations on YouTube — might seem modest, or even boring, but from an AI researcher’s perspective, it’s nirvana. That’s because of the fundamental difference between how machines and humans learn.

    “A 3-year-old can learn an enormous amount of things from very few examples,” Gupta says. The same cannot be said for computers, which require vast quantities of data to acquire the same level of understanding. It also requires some pretty significant computing resources, which is why Nvidia recently launched a new kind of supercomputer developed specifically to run deep-learning algorithms.

    Curiously, computer scientists have known how to “teach” machines for several decades. The missing ingredient has been, well, the ingredients. “You can have a model that can learn from a billion examples,” Gupta explains, “but if you don’t have a billion examples, the machine has nothing to learn from.” Which is why YouTube, with its monster catalog of videos, is the perfect place to nurture a data-hungry process like machine learning. Gupta’s algorithms are being taught two kinds of common sense, known as smoothness and monotonicity. Both feel like child’s play: Smoothness dictates that you shouldn’t let one small change throw off a decision that has been based on dozens of other factors, while monotonicity operates on an “all other things being equal, this one fact should make it the best choice” principle.

    In practice, smoothness means that a potentially great video recommendation isn’t dismissed by the algorithm simply because it contained both cooking and traveling information, when the previously watched video was purely about cooking. For monotonicity, Gupta cites the example of recommending a coffee shop. If you’ve identified that you like coffee shops that serve organic, fair trade coffee and that also have free Wi-Fi, then the one that is closest to you should top the recommended list, even though you never specified distance as important. “It would surprise some humans just how hard that is,” Gupta says of the effort involved in teaching machines to respect patterns that any 5-year-old could pick up on.

    Project Malmo Katja Hoffman

    More

    Microsoft researcher Katja Hofmann, center, is teaching machines to play Minecraft as part of Project Malmo, which is intended to improve human-machine cooperation. (Photo: Scott Eklund/Red Box Pictures)

    Mining for knowledge in Minecraft

    As successful as it might be at finding just the right video for you, that algorithm has trouble performing the same task with music recommendation. “It’s hard to transfer what we’ve learned,” Gupta acknowledges, something she says is a challenge for the industry, not just Google. So how do you teach an AI to be flexible, in addition to having common sense? Dr. Katja Hofmann, a researcher at the Machine Intelligence and Perception group at Microsoft Research Cambridge, thinks she has the answer: Teach it how to play Minecraft.

    Project Malmo is Hofmann’s attempt to repurpose the massively popular online game into an experimentation platform for artificial intelligence research. Her team has developed a modification for the game that lets AI “agents” interact directly with the Minecraft environment. “Minecraft is really interesting because it’s an open-world game,” Hofmann told us, which offers a unique space in which AI agents can deal with different environments that change over time, a key point if you’re trying to foster flexible learning. This aspect of Minecraft created problems during early attempts to get agents to achieve goals. “The world doesn’t wait for the agent to make its decision,” she says, referring to the real-time nature of the game, and its obvious parallels to real life.

    Using the mod not only gives an agent the ability to manipulate the LEGO-like bricks of material that are central to the game’s environment — it can also interact with other players, including humans. One of Hofmann’s long-term goals for Project Malmo is to improve human-computer cooperation. Much like at IBM, the philosophy driving these experiments, and in fact Microsoft’s entire approach to AI, is that it should work collaboratively with people. Experiments have already revealed that AI agents are able to complete tasks which humans simply found too hard. Hofmann is eagerly anticipating an agent that learns to collaborate with humans to solve tasks. “That would mean we have achieved a big breakthrough,” she said.

    It could come from collaboration. Earlier this year, Microsoft decided to open source Project Malmo, a move that could yield important discoveries, especially if Microsoft’s competitors take an interest. IBM’s Watson has proven its trivia chops on Jeopardy! but how would it fare when asked to build a house out of bricks? Over at Google, the team behind DeepMind has already enjoyed success in getting an algorithm to learn how to play Space Invaders! — a game with a single goal — maximize points — and only three control options: move left, move right, and fire. Does it possess the flexibility that Hofmann is trying to encourage for success in Minecraft?

    Strike up the roboband

    Having an entity that can apply logic, reasoning, and brute mathematical prowess to challenges in engineering, medicine, and research just makes sense. But what about art? Can AI play a role in the creation of beauty, whether it’s cinema, sculpture, or even music? Google is determined to find out.

    The company recently showed off the capabilities of its DeepMind AI platform to perform mind-bending, almost hallucinogenic transformations of images and videos through a process it has dubbed DeepDream. It’s a fun, trippy thing to do to your favorite photos, but it seems to fall short of the independent creative process we normally attribute to “artists,” and might be more appropriately described as an Instagram filter on steroids.

    dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream c e de

    More

    dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream d ca

    More

    dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream c e f

    More

    dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream fc ae

    More

    dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream e

    More

    dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream f

    More

    dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream f

    More

    dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream bf c ca

    More

    dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream ec b

    More

    Google’s Deep Dream Generator reinterprets photos into psychedelic works of art using neural networks. (Photos: Deep Dream Generator)

    Dr. Douglas Eck, a research scientist at Google, was intrigued when he first saw DeepDream. He recognized it immediately as a powerful example of machine learning, or “good ol’-fashioned neural networks, done right,” as he puts it. But Eck was also struck by something else: “This stuff can be fun.” So Eck decided to lobby the senior brass at Google to let him build a small team to investigate how machine learning could be further leveraged in the world of art, only this time it would be focused on music, an area Eck has long been passionate about. “Much to my pleasure,” Eck recounts, “Google was right on board with this,” and Magenta was born.

    Generating music algorithmically isn’t new. You can listen to some of Eck’s own efforts from his time working on it at the University of Montreal in 2002. “The question is,” Eck asks, philosophically, “how do you build models that can generate [music] and can understand whether they’re good or not, based upon feedback from their audience, and then improve?”  It starts to sound like Magenta is going to unleash a horrible new wave of computer-generated Muzak, but Eck is quick to assure us that’s not the point. “In the end,” he says, “people want to connect with people. Consuming 100-percent machine-generated content is a bit of dead end.”

    Instead, he sees Magenta as an opportunity to create the world’s next electric guitar. “Can we build AI tools that help people express themselves in ways they couldn’t before?” Eck wonders. He cites Jimi Hendrix’s iconic use of amplification and distortion as an example: “That really opened up whole channels for him to express himself that weren’t there before,” he told Digital Trends.

    But unlike Hendrix’s guitar, the instruments that Magenta births will ideally be smart. Really smart. “You can already drop some bass loops into GarageBand and play on top of it,” he points out. “But what if there’s actually some smarts to this bassist?” In Eck’s vision of the future, the Magenta code base will construct a virtual bandmate that listens to you as you play, and can intelligently — perhaps even creatively — follow along and respond accordingly. “It’s like your copilot,” he said.

    Just like Project Malmo, Magenta is now open source, an important step if any of Eck’s dreams for a backup band of AI musicians are to be realized. Because Magenta is built on a machine-learning framework — Google’s own open-source TensorFlow software — it is incredibly data hungry. By opening access to a worldwide community of musicians, Magenta could evolve very quickly. “If we can be playing along with other musicians, the amount of information that’s present for learning is just astonishing,” Eck enthuses.

    From music to megalomania?

    Each of the AI experts we spoke to all share an enthusiasm for the future potential of the technology that borders on the religious. They also share an equally skeptical view of Bostrom’s doomsday prophecies. For them, the notion that one day a superintelligent AI will turn on an unsuspecting human population remains very much the domain of science fiction, not science fact.

    “I do not believe that machines are going to end up being autonomous entities that go off and do things on their own,” IBM’s Banavar says when asked about the likelihood of a machine intelligence that would need to be controlled. His primary concern for our future with the machines is one that programmers have been obsessing over for years: Poor performance because of bug-ridden code. “That’s a much bigger problem in my mind than machines that will wake up one day and do something they weren’t designed to do,” he said.

    Google’s Gupta points to a basic stumbling block that she thinks will hamstring the development of a strong AI for years to come: “Our best philosophers and neuroscientists aren’t sure what consciousness is,” she notes, “so how can we even start talking about what it means [for a machine to be conscious] or how we would go about replicating that digitally?” It’s hard to tell if she’s being sincere or coy — many observers have suggested that if any entity working on the AI problem today will crack the code, it’s probably going to be Google. Given a sufficiently long runway, she believes anything is possible. “I think we can do it … I’d think in the next hundred years,” she offers. “I’m just not sure it’s going to be that interesting.”

    Microsoft’s Hofmann echoes Gupta’s thoughts about the difficulty of achieving a machine with a truly general level of intelligence. “I believe that it may be possible in principle,” she says, “but just knowing the state of the art in AI, I don’t see us getting anywhere close to those predictions any time in the near future.”

    Google’s Eck finds the topic somewhat exasperating. “This whole idea of superintelligence,” he says, “it just doesn’t make sense to me. I guess I really don’t get it.” It’s hard to reconcile this confusion with the fact that he’s on a mission to create the first intelligent, synthetic musician. But he clarifies a moment later: “My view of cognition is so tied to human perception and action. I don’t look at our brains as these computational boxes [in competition] with these other, stronger brains in boxes that happen to be inside computers.” When asked how far we might be from such a scenario, he laughs and says, “Twenty years!” because, as he points out, that’s the usual time frame experts give when they have no idea, but they need to say something.

    Skeptics of Bostrom’s predictions of AI supremacy aren’t limited to those working in the field. He has also drawn criticism from the world of philosophy and ethics. Michael Chorost, author of Rebuilt: How Becoming Part Computer Made Me More Human and World Wide Mind: The Coming Integration of Humanity, Machines, and the Internet, feels he has a strong understanding of how computers and their code work, despite not having a background in AI. He classifies Bostrom’s Superintelligence as “a brilliantly wrong book.”

    Chorost believes we may create increasingly powerful AI agents, but he’s unconvinced these algorithms will ever become sentient, let alone sapient. He compares these concerns to climbing a tree, and then declaring we’re closer to the moon. Much like Gupta, Banavar and Eck, he says the biggest question is how a machine, made up of circuits and code, could ever achieve that status. He subscribes to the idea that there is something inherently special about our bodies, and their “aqueous chemical” makeup, that no electronic system will ever be able to duplicate.

    He falls short of ruling it out completely, however, and offers one possibly viable route it could take: An evolutionary one. Instead of trying to program awareness into machines, we should let nature do the heavy lifting. “Putting it in a complex environment that forces [an AI] to evolve,” Chorost suggests, might do the trick. “The environment should be lethally complex,” he says, evoking images of AIs competing in a virtual gladiator’s arena, “so that it kills off ineffective systems and rewards effective ones.”

    The other benefit to this artificial Darwinism, if it succeeds, is that it will produce a moral AI with no genocidal tendencies. “Morality is actually built into how evolution works,” he claims, saying that all you need to do is look at humanity for the proof. “Despite both world wars, the rate of violent death has been consistently falling,” he notes. “We’re actually getting more moral with each passing decade — that is not accidental. That’s a process that comes out of reason.” Chorost himself reasons that any AI that develops over time — thanks to evolution — will thus be a kinder, gentler entity because we’ve seen this process play out in all of us.

    So why worry?

    Perhaps Chorost is right. Perhaps the essential ingredients for sentience will never be reproduced in silicon, and we’ll be able to live comfortably knowing that as incredibly capable as Siri becomes, she’s never going to follow her own desires instead of catering to ours, like in the movie Her. But even if you don’t buy into the idea that one day AI will become an existential threat, Gary Marchant thinks we should all be paying a lot more attention to the risks that come with even a moderately more sophisticated level of artificial intelligence.

    Officially, Marchant is the Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law and Ethics at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University. When he’s not lecturing students at ASU, he’s working on a legal and ethical framework for the development of AI as a member of the international engineering standards body, the IEEE. When he’s not doing that, Marchant co-investigates the “control and responsible innovation in the development of autonomous machines” thanks to grant money from the Future Of Life Institute — an organization that funds research and outreach on scenarios that could pose an existential risk to humanity (including AI). These activities give Marchant a 50,000-foot perspective on AI that few others possess. His conclusion? There are two areas that require immediate attention.

    Military drones like the MQ-9 Reaper currently only operate with human pilots remotely at the controls, but AI developments may eventually enable them to kill autonomously. (Photo: General Atomics Aeronautical)

    “One that concerns me the most,” he says, “is the use of AI in the military.” At the moment, the U.S. drone arsenal is remote-controlled. The pilot is still in command, even if she’s sitting hundreds of miles away, but that scenario may already have an expiration date. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, is reportedly interested in developing autonomous software agents that could identify and repair security risks in computing systems. “There will be strong incentives to go more and more autonomous,” Marchant warns, because it will be seen as the only viable way to respond to an adversary who is already benefitting from the faster-than-human decision-making these systems are capable of. “Then you’re reliant on these systems not to make mistakes,” he notes, ominously.

    It might be easy to dismiss his concerns were it not for the fact that a federal advisory board to the Department of Defense just released a study on autonomy that echoes his words, almost verbatim: “Autonomous capabilities are increasingly ubiquitous and are readily available to allies and adversaries alike. The study therefore concluded that DoD must take immediate action to accelerate its exploitation of autonomy while also preparing to counter autonomy employed by adversaries.”

    The other use of AI that Marchant believes is in need of examination is much closer to home: “The movement toward autonomous cars,” he says, is going to require thoughtful development and much better regulation.

    Tesla Autopilot allows the Model S to drive autonomously on the highway, but a number of crashes prove it’s not yet perfect. (Video: Tesla)

    “As we recently saw with Tesla,” he observes, referencing the recent crashes — and one death — connected to the company’s autopilot system, “it’s a harbinger of what’s to come — people being injured or killed by an autonomous system making decisions.”

    He highlights the very real ethical decisions that will be faced by AI-controlled cars: In an accident situation, whose life should be preserved — that of the passenger, another driver, or a pedestrian? It’s a question many are wrestling with, including Oren Etzioni, a computer scientist at the University of Washington and the CEO of the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence, who told Wired: “We don’t want technology to play God.”

    What Marchant clearly isn’t worried about is biting the hand that feeds: Much of his Future Of Life grant comes from Tesla CEO Elon Musk.

    What about the jobs?

    Today’s manufacturing robots follow meticulously programmed instructions, but future models like this prototype from Fanuc could learn from reinforcement, just like humans. (Photo: Fanuc)

    Further into the future, Marchant sees a huge problem with AI replacing human workers, a process that he claims has already begun. “I was talking to a pathologist,” he recounts, “who said his field is drying up because machines are taking it over.” Recently, a prototype AI based on IBM’s Watson began working at a global law firm. Its machine discovery and document review capabilities, once sufficiently advanced, could affect the jobs of young associate lawyers, which Marchant thinks demonstrates that it’s not only menial jobs that are at risk. “This is going to become a bigger and bigger issue,” he said. Fanuc, the largest provider of industrial robots, has recently used reinforcement learning to teach an embodied AI how to perform a new job — in 24 hours.

    Google’s Gupta offers an optimistic perspective, saying, “The more interesting story is the jobs that are being created,” though she stops short of listing any of these new jobs. Her Google colleague, Eck, puts it into a historical (and of course, musical) frame, noting that the advent of drum machines didn’t create legions of unemployed drummers (or, at the very least, it didn’t add to their existing numbers). “We still have lots of drummers, and a lot of them are doing really awesome things with drum machines,” he says.

    Marchant understands these arguments, but ultimately, he rejects them. The always-on, 24/7 decision-making nature of AI puts it into a technology class by itself he says. “There will be so many things that machines will be able to do better than humans,” he notes. “There was always something for humans to move to in the past. That isn’t the case now.”

    Interestingly, the biggest players in AI aren’t deaf to these and other concerns regarding AI’s future impact on society and have recently joined forces to create a new nonprofit organization called The Partnership on Artificial Intelligence to Benefit People and Society, or the shorter Partnership on AI. Its members include Microsoft, Google, IBM, Facebook, and Amazon, and its stated goal is to “address opportunities and challenges with AI technologies” through open and collaborative research. The partnership isn’t interested in consulting with policymaking bodies, but the public could end up steering it that way if they can’t be convinced of the technology’s benefits.

    Surprisingly, Marchant isn’t ready to demand more laws or more regulations right away. “I’m almost worried that sometimes we move too quickly,” he says, “and start putting in place laws before we know what we’re trying to address.”

    Just say no to AI

    Dr. Kathleen Richardson, Senior Research Fellow in the Ethics of Robotics at De Montfort University, knows exactly what she’s trying to address: The goal of an aware AI, or any AI designed to mimic living things, she believes, is a fundamentally flawed pursuit. “The only reason we think it’s possible that machines could be like people,” she says, “is because we had — and still have — slavery.” For Richardson, using machines as a stand-in for a person, or indeed any other living entity, is a byproduct of a corrupt civilization that is still trying to find rationalizations to treat people as objects.

    “We share properties with all life,” she says, “but we don’t share properties with human-made artifacts.” Reversing this logic, Richardson dismissed the notion that we will ever create an aware, sentient, or sapient algorithm. “I completely, utterly, 100 percent reject it,” she says. Perhaps because of this ironclad belief, Richardson doesn’t spend much time worrying about superintelligent, killer AIs. Why think about a future that will never come to pass? Instead, she’s focused her research on AI and robotics in the here and now, as well as their near-term impact. What she sees, she does not like — in particular the trend toward robotic companions, driven by improvements in AI. Though most well-known for her anti-sex robot position, Richardson opposes robotic companionship of any kind.

    Softbank Pepper Robot

    More

    Pepper is designed to be a humanoid companion, keeping owners company like a pet, rather than performing any specific task. (Photo: Softbank)

    “They say that these robots — these objects — are going to be therapeutic,” she says, referring specifically to the bleeding-edge Japanese market, which has the support of industry heavyweights like SoftBank and Sony. Richardson doesn’t put much faith in this notion, which she thinks is nothing more than yet another rationalization linked to slavery. “If you talk to elderly people,” she says, “what they want is day trips out, and contact with other human beings. None of them said, ‘What I want most of all is a robot.’” Perhaps she’s right, and yet that didn’t stop SoftBank’s Pepper — the first companion robot capable of interpreting basic human emotions — from selling out its initial run of 1,000 units in less than a minute.

    Sherry Turkle, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology researcher, psychologist and author, agrees with Richardson’s viewpoint, but mostly because she has seen that — contrary to Richardson’s claim — there is demand for AI companions, and that worries her. In 2013, Turkle gave an interview to Live Science, saying, “The idea of some kind of artificial companionship has already become the new normal.” The price for this new normalcy is that “we have to change ourselves, and in the process, we are remaking human values and human connection.”

    Sophia from Hanson Robotics, also pictured at the top of this article, achieves an almost creepy level of resemblance to a real human. (Video: Hanson Robotics)

    That would be just fine with Dr. David Hanson of Hanson Robotics. “The artificial intelligence will evolve to the point where they will truly be our friends,” he told CNBC.

    Marchant has already weighed in on this subject. Instead of fighting this new normal, he says we might just have to embrace it. In his controversial Slate article, he outlines a future where marriages between humans and robots will not only be legal, they will be inevitable. “If a robotic companion could provide some kind of comfort and love — apparent love at least — I’m not sure that’s wrong,” he says, citing the fact that there are many in our society who, for various reasons, are incapable of forming these kinds of relationships with other humans.

    Marchant makes it clear that he still values human relationships above those that involve synthetic companions, but he’s also prepared to accept that not everyone will share these values. “I’m certainly not going to marry a robot, but if my son wanted to 20 years from now, I wouldn’t say he couldn’t do that,” he claims. “I’d try to talk him out of it, but if that’s what made him happy, I’d be more concerned about that than anything else.” Perhaps as a sign of the times, earlier this year a draft plan for the EU included wording that would give robots official standing as “electronic persons.”

    Stepping toward the future

    Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has said that in 10 years, it’s likely that AI will be better than humans at basic sensory perception. Li Deng, a principal researcher at Microsoft, agrees, and goes even further, saying, “Artificial Intelligence technologies will be used pervasively by ordinary people in their daily lives.”

    Eric Schmidt, executive chairman of Google parent Alphabet, and Google CEO Pichai see an enormous explosion in the number of applications, products, and companies that have machine learning at their core. They are quick to point out that this type of AI, with its insatiable appetite for data, will only fulfill its potential when paired with the cloud. Urs Hölzle, Google’s senior vice president of technical infrastructure, said, “Over the next five years, I expect to see more change in computing than in the last five decades.”

    These predictions are — somewhat obviously, given their sources — highly positive, but that doesn’t mean the road ahead will resemble the Autobahn. There could be significant bumps. IBM’s Banavar points to a few challenges that could hamper progress. “One of the breakthroughs we need,” he says, “is how you combine the statistical technique [of machine learning] with the knowledge-based technique.” He refers to the fact that even though machines have proven powerful at sifting through huge volumes of data to determine patterns and predict outcomes, they still don’t understand its “meaning.”

    The other big challenge is being able to ramp up the computing power we need to make the next set of AI leaps possible. “We are working on new architectures,” he reveals, “inspired by the natural structures of the brain.” The premise here is that if brain-inspired software, like neural nets, can yield powerful results in machine learning, then brain-inspired hardware might be equally (or more) powerful.

    All this talk about brain-inspired technology inevitably leads us back to our first, spooky, concern: In the future, AI might be a collection of increasingly useful tools that can free us from drudgery, or it could evolve rapidly — and unbeknownst to us — into the most efficient killing machine ever invented.

    One of those options certainly seems a lot more desirable, but how do we make sure that’s the version we end up with?

    If we follow AI expert Chorost’s advice, there’s no reason to worry, because as long as our AIs evolve, they’ll develop morality — and morality leads to benevolence. That’s assuming it’s even possible, which he disputes. “When an engineering path [to sentient AI] becomes clear,” he says, “then we’ll have a sense of what not to do.”

    Banavar, despite being fairly certain that an AI with its own goals isn’t in our future, suggests that “it is a smart thing for us to have a way to turn off the machine.” The team at Google’s DeepMind agree and have written a paper in conjunction with the Future Of Life Institute that describes how to create the equivalent of a “big red button” that would let the human operator of an AI agent suspend its functions, even if the agent became smart enough to realize such a mechanism existed. The paper, titled “Safely Interruptible Agents,” does not go so far as to position itself as the way to counter a runaway superintelligence, but it’s a step in the right direction as far as Tesla CEO Musk is concerned: He recently implied that Google is the “one” company whose AI efforts keep him awake at night.

    Interestingly, during the same interview with Recode, Musk suggested that OpenAI — an organization he backs that operates a grass-roots effort to make AI technology widely available to everyone — could be the ultimate antidote to a malevolent AI agent. If everyone possessed their own personal AI, he reckons, “if somebody did try to something really terrible, then the collective will of others could overcome that bad actor.”

    Perhaps we will develop a strong AI. Perhaps it won’t be friendly. Perhaps we will be pushed to extinction by Skynet, offered a tenuous, uneasy truce by the machines of The Matrix, or simply ignored and left to our own (less intelligent) devices by the superintelligent OS One from Her.

    Or perhaps, to quote computer scientist and AI skeptic Peter Hassan, we will simply keep “pursuing an ever-increasing number of irrelevant activities as the original goal recedes ever further into the future — like the mirage it is.”


    What will power IBM Power servers? | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    In her annual letter to shareholders this week, IBM CEO Ginni Rometty certainly accentuated the positives of 2013.

    She spent ample time citing the progress made in the company's cognitive and cloud computing initiatives, even managing to sprinkle in a little positive financial news about the diluted operating earnings per share reaching a new record last year.

    What she spent much less time on were the disappointing aspects, most notably the spiraling fortunes of IBM's Power series of mid-range servers and its storage products.

    Rometty is justified in touting the advances made by Watson and the new groundwork laid down for its cloud computing strategy now anchored by SoftLayer and what both mean for the future. But IT shops, particularly those looking to launch new cloud environments this year, need more concrete details sooner rather than later about what the company plans to do now about its flailing Power series.

    Many IT shops have sunk significant investments in these systems and data and must know if it is worth their financial while to stay with the Power series or migrate to less expensive Intel-based servers. And the fact IBM will deliver the Power 8 chip next month puts more pressure on their decisions.

    IBM could end up where it started in the hardware business almost exactly 50 years ago, with just its mainframes.

    Unfortunately, Rometty didn't offer much guidance.

    Rather vaguely, she said IBM hopes to shift its hardware business toward "new realities and opportunities," as well as toward Linux. This, she says, follows the lead of the company's "successful" mainframe business.

    It is true that IBM's mainframe business throughout 2013 saw a remarkable resurgence thanks to new systems, but I am not sure how much the Power series can ape the success of IBM's Series z. While both systems can attribute some success to bundling Linux, the mainframe is much less dependent on the open source operating system. Mainframes and Power systems also play very different roles in most corporations.

    Underlining its commitment to the Power series, Rometty points to the sale of its Intel-based server business to Lenovo. Last year's sale of the lower-end systems is consistent with the company's long-term strategy to abandon lower-margin businesses, as it did with its desktop PCs, hard disks and retail products. This makes sense given IBM's corporate overhead, but IBM users who migrate off the Power platform and onto an Intel platform will be going to an IBM competitor.

    If IBM puts a lot of eggs in its Power series basket, and if it stays true to its mission of "remixing to higher value," as Rometty wrote, that eliminates the possibility of significantly lowering prices to increase sales.

    Maybe she figures the ever growing demand for big data, cloud and mobility solutions will provide ample opportunity for both the Power and System z servers without one trampling the market opportunities of the other. The Power ship has yet to rise with that tide.

    In conversations with IBM executives at the company's Pulse conference last month, it became clear the company bets that SoftLayer can not only lift the fortunes of its cloud business but it's hardware, too. By tailoring a range of key open source software, as well as migrating IBM’s most popular applications to SoftLayer, which will also be optimized to take best advantage of the Power systems architecture, IBM can deliver compelling tools for large companies.

    That made sense five, even 10 years ago. But in this overly obsessed price-sensitive world of IT, cost savings often trump a system that represents a good bang for the buck.

    So despite Rometty's assurance that IBM is "not exiting hardware, and will remain a leader in high-performance and high-end systems," IBM must communicate a compelling set of reasons that bolsters users' faith in the future of the Power series. Otherwise, IBM could end up where it started in the hardware business almost exactly 50 years ago, with just its mainframes.


    New IBM POWER7 Blades, Systems Software, Services Cut IT Costs, Pave Way for New Workloads for Customers | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    No result found, try new keyword!The new offerings help clients reap the benefits of IBM's three-year, $3 billion investment in POWER7(TM) systems that are ... (4) The IBM Power 780 achieved the highest result ever published on the t...


    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]





    References :


    Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11942811
    Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12898031
    Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/12/review-000-224-real-question-and.html
    Wordpress : https://wp.me/p7SJ6L-2hu
    RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/FreePass4sure000-224QuestionBank
    Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/vfx8ywixjiroh5aizxzyzvfjmxzfla55






    Back to Main Page

    You really have to study hard. These questions are a big help and worth the price. Test Engine has specific steps which you need to follow in order to install it. But is a nice piece of software.

    Rajesh | INDIA



    I ordered this exam prep. The content is well formatted and pretty clean. I was able to use the PDF and the Test Engine to prepare. Quite helpful.

    Lisa | UNITED STATES



    Great Black Friday deal and good content. I am impressed

    Mike | Anonymous



    fast and easy order. No issues. I can't wait to pass this test!

    teechee | UNITED STATES



    Wouldn't have passed if I had not studied from this dump. Good job guys.

    Mitul | INDIA



    I did get about 80-85% of the questions in my exam. So it is a valid one.

    James | UNITED STATES



    What joy!
    I passed my exam today.

    Zan | UNITED KINGDOM



    Good Content

    Raj | UNITED STATES



    Trying to download the updates. Pretty solid braindumps.

    cpinkney | UNITED STATES



    Excellent!

    elixir | UNITED STATES



    Good, Definitely worth the investment.

    Tom | UNITED STATES



    I just completed the test and got a 96%. missed only 2 questions.

    Sahil | Franfurt



    I thought i should thank you for assisting me to obtain my ITIL qualification. I received the exam on Thursday and i studied the moment i received it. I must say i was very nervous before the exam. Well I wrote and passed. The pass mark was 65% and I scored 92%.
    Thank you so much guys.

    Nahid | Bremen



    I just completed my exam today and wanted to share the great news. Your study guide in combination with self study have helped me to achieve another certification. After the conclusion to this upcoming fall semester I plan to pursue my other goals... I hav

    John | koln



    Great Job. I passed my exam with score of 868. I got 100 questions and could finish the exam within 20 minutes, ofcourse after my two weeks of hard work.

    Anon | Anon



    I took my exam today and passed with a score of 87%. After taking the practise exam with all the 200+ questions included with your material and reading the student manual once I felt that I had no problem passing this exam. Great material!

    JK | Dortmund



    Today, I passed my Exam and I have to say that the your materials for the Exam helped get me into the right frame of mind for taking the exam. The Help button for each question is an invaluable feature. Great job getting this together!

    Munchi | Rotterdam



    I just had to say thank you so much for such a fantastic product ! I just completed my exam in 30 minutes with a score of 95%.

    Angili | Emmen



    I just took my Certification testing for Apple exam and passed it with full score. Your questions covered the essence of the exam material.

    Madu | Nederland




    I truely appreciate your prompt response. It has been nice doing business with you. I have already registered for the exam (taking it this weekend) and it went smooth as you assured. I plan to come back to your site in future for my other certification.

    Priyanka | Ireland



    Thanks a lot for your help. I have successfully completed my exams studying your materials. It was a great help by you.
    "It was an excellent total immersion exams material."

    Peter | Leeds UK





    I just passed the exam with 90%. Thanks for your help.

    Audreena | Norwich




    hello again. First of all i'd like to inform you'll that i passed my oracle 1zo-042 exam with the help of your questions. I owe it all to you'll so thank you. Thank you so much. You really changed my life!

    Viki | Belfast



    Yesterday I cleared Solaris 9 Administration Certification Paper Part 1 ( CX 310-014). Your Cheat-Test paper is really very helpful. My test result was 91%.

    Josef | Dundee



    Hey Guys. I wanna thank you for helping me through providing 310-012 exam and Training Material. It is so good that I will recommend all my friends to use.

    Josh | Cardiff



    I just passed my Exam using your QA product. Thanks!

    Reddy | Glasgow



    Warm greetings and let me thank you so very much for the great stuff you are doing. I am now a 000-207 Certified. I passed all with flying colors.

    Jessica | SD



    I passed the written exam with 920. Thank you very much for your services. It was worth every penny of it.

    Bella | VA



    I just wanted you all to know that you have really changed my life. Recently I passed the CCSA exam and now just passed the CCSE exam. My employer is so delighted with my integrity that I just received a 12% pay increase. This is too good to be true. Thank

    Mike | Victoria



    I was feeling helpless for my exam and then find material at your website and passed with 90. thank you guys.

    Racheal | colima



    I purchased your products, it was great, really helped me pass the exam. thank you

    Lisa | Mexico



    I just bought the exam prep two days before writing my exam. I studied the guide inside out and wrote the exam in under 45 minutes! The most amazing part is that I passed with a score of 1000!! WOW, you are the greatest and I will always use your products.

    Vishal | Lahor



    Tried many websites for my 70-500 Exam Preparation but no vain and finally i tried your study material for my exam and it was impressive and I was able to clear Exam with confidence. thanks you very much!

    Aalia | Deli



    I will, you guys have always been really good whenever i buy stuff from u and need questions answering....keep up the good work
    THANK YOU !

    Jacob | Piaui



    I passed the the NSO-111 with flying colors. Thank your for your help.

    Mark | Para



    You gusy Rock!
    killexams.com provided everything you could want and made things very comfortable.

    Tanisha | Sinop



    Great products!! I passed the CCIE written exam on my first attempt!

    Neesha | India



    I have already given up...but your exam and study packs finally made me pass this CCNA exam!

    Angus | Kansas



    My company needed me to pass the CCIP exams, as we are a Service Provider offering more and more Voice Services. Great exam materials you provide!

    Terah | San Angelo



    I was lucky enough to use killexams.com for my 000-630 Certification Exam Training. The difference is clear. I passed the exam without a problem. Have you done it yet or not?

    Kim | Lubbock



    I am very happy with the performance of your 000-094 QA from you. It is no doubt the best.

    Martin | Calgary



    I just made it in the 000-215 Exam. Your 000-215 QA is outclass. Made it so easy for me to succeed.

    Shila M. | Montana



    I have passed all the 7 Windows 2000 MCSE tests with the help of your great guides. Those questions I met in my tests are very very similar, if not the same, with the ones in your guides. 70-220 and 70-221 are so difficult. I can't imagine how I could pass

    Rosa | Monitoba



    Hi, I passed today!!! I passed both my exams within ONE WEEK!!! THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!

    Aaron G. | vancouver



    I just passed (310-025) SCJP test yesterday. Your guide is right on the money and almost covers every question word for word. Great work !

    seagal | Edmonton



    I passed my exam today with a score of 964. This was a difficult test but the preparation guide was very good. I would not have passed without the materials. Thank you very much for giving me the opportunity to better my life.

    Illya | Alberta



    Exam syo-101 Exam
    I passed my exam today with no problem whatsoever. I just wanted to say a sincere thank you for the outstanding study guide. You guys are a phenomenal help when it comes to study assistance. Thanks and definitely expect to see me again.

    Jackson | MJ



    Exam 1Z0-040: 1Z0-040 passed!!!
    I have passed my exam 59/60. You people are the boom. Thanks for the exam questions. They were so real!!

    CJ | DC



    Dear Support,
    I passed (as you expected) the Sun Solaris Admin I (310-011) at first trial. Thank you so much.

    Oshrit | Israel



    Just thought I would let you know I took the CCDA test on Tuesday, like I planned and scored a 902!"

    Lee W. | China



    I have used your Exams for preparation for 70-290, 70-291, 70-292, 70-296, 70-298, 70- 299, 70-300, 70-305, 70-310, 70-315, 70-316,70-320. I also passed all those on the first round. I'm currently preparing for the CCNA.

    Micheal C. | ON



    Now my dream has come true. I thank you a million times for the best study guides that you provided to a poor kid like me....I got it. Finally MCSE.

    Best regards,

    kris J. | GTA



    I passed my CCNA exam yesterday. I would like to make some comments. "Excellent Study Guide, Excellent Support Service, Excellent Examination Web Site"
    Best Regards

    Jason | California



    Thanks for your study guides, i have passed it. All questions in your material, we study this only 2 days. Thanks very very much!!!!!

    Micheal | US



    Thanks very much for your study guides, with your help i only use 3 weeks to take the MCSE. Your study guides are very very good.

    L. Woo | China



    I passed the CCIE Written exam 350-001 last Friday, Thanks very much for your study guide and your help.

    Mick H. | US



    i ust wanted to thank you folks at braindumgalaxy.com for your assistance. I used your CCNP exams for practice and to identify my weak areas. Passed the CCNP recert on Tuesday without any big problems.

    Hagit | Israel



    I have found that your resources are probably the best on the market...and I work at Cisco.

    Cisco Engineer | USA



    A well Good morning Dear killexams.com Team I wanna say that I passed the 000-888 yesterday and i am happy

    Koshani | NYC



    I took the A+ hardware exam yesterday and thanks to your excellent and helping preparation material. I got a nice score.

    Aized | Pakistan



    I passed the exam with great distinction!

    Nazanin | Toronto



    Great Price....Great Product. Keep up the good work!

    Xiwan W | China



    So far your practice exams are extremely helpful. My test scores keep on going up every time I do them and I feel very confident now.

    Ashwin | India



    The exams was excellent and helped me pass without any doubt.Very helpful! Thank you! I passed!

    Mike M | Dubai